“This system — where police can seize property with limited judicial oversight and retain it for their own use — has led to egregious and well-chronicled abuses,” Thomas wrote, referring to reporting by The Washington Post and the New Yorker.
At oral argument, Timbs’s lawyer said the case was a simple matter of “constitutional housekeeping.” -Washington Post
It only takes a few moments to share an article, but the person on the other end who reads it might have his life changed forever.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
US Supreme Court Rules To Limit States' Ability To Seize Property, Impose Fines
Other USSC Justices were highly critical of property seizures and
fines, with Justice Clarence Thomas suggesting that civil forfeitures
had become "widespread and highly profitable."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment