Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear Warrantless Electronic Surveillance Case, And Obama is Glad - Hit & Run : Reason.com

Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear Warrantless Electronic Surveillance Case, And Obama is Glad.

The Supreme Court closed a 6-year-old chapter Tuesday in the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s bid to hold the nation’s telecoms liable for allegedly providing the National Security Agency with backdoors to eavesdrop, without warrants, on Americans’ electronic communications in violation of federal law.

The justices, without comment, declined to review a lower court’s December decision (.pdf) dismissing the EFF’s lawsuit challenging the NSA’s warrantless eavesdropping program. At the center of the dispute was 2008 congressional legislation retroactively immunizing the telcos from being sued for cooperating with the government in a program President George W. Bush adopted shortly after the September 2001 terror attacks.

Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear Warrantless Electronic Surveillance Case, And Obama is Glad - Hit & Run : Reason.com

 Of course they don't, they are suppose to be neutral but are just as political and corrupt as the other 2 branches