*DNC refused to let FBI look at servers
*DNC hired company 10 MONTHS later
*That company blames Russia#SethRich pic.twitter.com/lD9oOI1gDg
— Rep. Steven Smith (@RepStevenSmith) May 16, 2017
Crowdstrike, who Claimed the “Evidence” that Putin hacked election ABANDONS the Claims – and REFUSES to co-operate with Congress
- Claims of Russian interference in the presidential election through hacking Democratic emails have been long-running scandal
- First link between hacking and Vladimir Putin was made by CrowdStrike, Irvine, CA, based firm hired by the Democratic National Committee
- It concluded in June 2016 Moscow spies had hacked DNC – before embarrassing emails were published – setting off Russian election scandal
- Cybersecurity firm examined DNC’s servers, something FBI was not allowed to do, and its conclusion has been repeated by the intelligence community
- DailyMail.com reveals it has had to abandon key claims in another report on hacking by same Russians it blamed for DNC attack
- It used unproven claims by a pro-Putin blogger to wrongly conclude Russian hackers had helped to virtually wipe out Ukrainian artillery
- CrowdStrike is also refusing to testify in public to the House Intelligence Committee on what it knows and declined to speak to DailyMail.com
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html#ixzz4iZEpGDmk
Crowdstrike, who claimed evidence Putin hacked election ABANDON claims – and refuse to co-operate with Congress
Crowdstrike, who claimed evidence Putin hacked election ABANDON claims – and refuse to co-operate with Congress. https://t.co/uM9Np3rBQ0— TruthInGovernment (@TruthinGov2016) May 30, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment